Alexanderýs central question addresses the secularization of feminism
and the dire need to address the sacred at a time when fundamentalism
and political faith-based initiatives on the part of the state have
emerged to appropriate the domain of the spiritual. Experience is an
important dimension of daily life as well as an important category for
feminism, but we have rendered it as if it were absent Spirit,
understood it primarily as secularized and antithetical to the sacred.
Using her own priestancy in two African-based spiritual communities of
Vodun and Santeria, Alexander traces how experience, history, memory,
consciousness, voice and agencyýcustomarily positioned as secular--are
all readily intelligible within the precinct of the sacred. What would
taking the sacred seriously mean for transnational feminism particularly
because the majority of people in the world understand who they are in
what they do through this prism? What would taking the sacred seriously
mean for ourselves?