"What happens after climate change adaptation projects end?"

As climate change impacts escalate, donors, international organizations, and state actors are implementing adaptation projects that seek to make landscapes and livelihoods more resilient. These projects typically last 5 years, at which time these actors withdraw, and local communities are left to sustain adaptation interventions. However, to date, few studies have examined what unfolds after adaptation projects end. This talk draws on 3 years of mixed-method and collaborative research to explore diverging understandings of success and failure in the wake of a concluded climate change adaptation project in Ecuador. The project is assessed based on community-generated criteria for success drawn from participant observation, participatory mapping, interviews, and quantitative surveys with project participants, adaptation professionals, and local leaders. This study highlights the spatial and temporal contingencies of “success,” contributing to public debates on adaptation evaluation, the sustainability of adaptation measures, the limitations of the adaptation finance structure, and the role of community actors in adaptation.  

Biography:

Meg Mills-Novoa is an assistant professor with a joint appointment to the Society and Environment Division of the Department of the Environmental Sciences, Policy, and Management and the Energy and Resources Group at UC Berkeley. As a human-environment geographer, her research focuses on equity and climate change adaptation planning and action. She has served as a contributing author to the IPCC 5th and 6th assessment reports and published her work on adaptation in such journals as Geoforum, Annals of the AAG, Climate WIRES, Climate Risk Management, and Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability.